89.9 FM Live From The University Of New Mexico
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

TUES: Pilot injured after a military plane crashes near Sunport, + More

Kirtland Air Force Base
Kirtland Air Force Base

Pilot injured after a military aircraft crashes near international airport in Albuquerque - Associated Press 

A military aircraft crashed Tuesday near the international airport in New Mexico's largest city, sending up a large plume of smoke and injuring the pilot.

The pilot, the only person on board, was able to escape after crashing around 2 p.m. on the south side of the airport and was taken to a hospital with serious injuries, according to Albuquerque's fire department. A video posted by the department on X showed a burn scar on a hillside.

Kirtland Air Force Base was leading the investigation into the crash. The base did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It marks the second crash of a military plane in New Mexico in the past month. In April, an F-16 Fighting Falcon went down in a remote area near Holloman Air Force Base in the southern part of the state, leaving that pilot with minor injuries after he ejected from the aircraft.

Authorities haven't said what type of aircraft was involved in the crash near Kirtland Air Force Base.

Located on the southern edge of Albuquerque, the base is home to the 377th Air Base Wing, which conducts nuclear operations and trains and equips expeditionary forces. It's also home to the Air Force Research Laboratory.

Patrick White, who was driving in the area at the time, told The Associated Press that he saw an aircraft trailing low on the ground, kicking up a cloud of dirt and dust. He said the aircraft briefly disappeared from his line of sight, and then he saw "an enormous plume of black smoke."

When he drove past the crash, he said he saw a piece of it in the middle of the road.

What to expect: APS board to finalize $2.15 billion budget - By Rodd Cayton, City Desk ABQ

Albuquerque Public Schools board members are set to finalize the budget for next school year at their May 29 special meeting.

The budget the board will decide on includes $2.15 billion, which covers both APS operations and those of district-authorized charter schools.

The budget includes a 3% raise for all employees, as approved by the New Mexico Legislature earlier this year.

Preparation of the spending plan began shortly after the Feb. 15 end of the legislative session.

District officials provided preliminary information to the board at its Feb. 7 meeting. After that came steering committee meetings, and individual schools and departments within APS then submitted their budget requests.

Principals attended budget workshops in late February, and district officials made presentations to the board on various budget areas at the first meeting of each month since then.

CHARTER CHANGES

The proposed budget shows substantial changes for six charter schools.

  • William W. & Josephine Dorn Community Charter School will “pause” for a year; its budget was $843,928 for fiscal year 2023-2024.
  • Voz Collegiate Preparatory Charter School’s expected state aid is up 85.36% to $1,365,290. The school is expanding into high school over the next four years, starting with the addition of ninth grade in 2024-2025.
  • Siembra Leadership High School is expected to see enrollment increase from 359 this school year to a projected 380 in 2024-2025. That will mean its allocation from the state will rise from $3,537,978 to $5,138,537.
  • An increase in program units at Coral Community Charter School means its state aid will rise 25.94% to 2,833,872.
  • Decreases in program units mean New America School and Robert F Kennedy High School will see their state aid drop by 15.8% and 14.14%, respectively.

Program units, under state law, are used to calculate the cost of educating a student. The Legislature’s glossary defines a kindergartner’s seat in a classroom as 1.44 program units, while each student in grades 7-12 is counted as 1.25 program units.

BIGGER APS ROLE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION

The board will also be asked to consider the approval of an intergovernmental agreement with Albuquerque and Bernalillo County that would recreate the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Government Commission as the Local Government Coordinating Commission. Currently, APS holds two advisory seats on the city-county commission.

Board of Education President Danielle Gonzales said earlier that the change will make the district a voting member of the commission.

Members Courtney Jackson and Heather Benavidez would continue to represent APS on the new commission.

CALENDAR CHANGE

The other action item on the agenda is a slight change to the 2024-2025 academic calendar. If the change is approved, the second semester would begin Jan 7, one day later than planned and a staff professional development day would be moved from that day to May 30, 2025, which is the last day of school in the calendar approved in February.

Channell Segura, chief of schools, wrote in an action report included in the agenda the recommended change is in response to concerns about the last day of school being a full day.

State Ethics Commission sues Apodaca’s dark money operation — Marjorie Childress, New Mexico In Depth

This story was originally published by New Mexico In Depth

The State Ethics Commission on Friday sued a dark money group and its president, Jeff Apodaca, to force disclosure of the sources behind the money paying for political advertising in support of legislative candidates running in the June 4 primary election.

The New Mexico Project registered as a domestic nonprofit corporation in New Mexico last fall, and has since spent thousands of dollars on political advertising. But the group hasn’t identified its donors.

In its 49-page complaint to the state’s Second Judicial District in Bernalillo County, the commission wrote that it is bringing the action to “stop Defendants’ ongoing efforts to frustrate the public’s right to know,” citing 2019 reforms to the state’s Campaign Reporting Act that attempt to eliminate “dark money.”

Those changes specifically targeted “independent expenditures” for disclosure – money that groups spend on political advertising without input from candidates.

To make its case, the commission draws heavily upon Apodaca’s own words made through numerous media outlets, including the KKOB radio shows of Bob Clark and T.J. Trout, and a column by Apodaca published in The Santa Fe New Mexican.

It noted that Apodaca used the term “independent expenditure” to describe the group’s spending, on Clark’s May 1 radio show: “We’re an educational independent expenditure. So we’re going in and educating the voters on what we need to do to get out and vote and vote for the right candidates.”

Citing Apodaca’s statements on that same show that his group can raise as much as it wants without having to disclose donors, the commission disagreed: “TNMP is mistaken; the Campaign Reporting Act requires TNMP to give New Mexicans basic information about the sources of the money TNMP is using to influence their votes.”

The complaint points to $10,000 paid to Cumulus Media for radio ads, noting that the memo line on the image of the check filed with the Federal Communications Commission by the radio stations states “Radio Ad – Primary.” The complaint also describes 33 Facebook ads placed by the group to support candidates.

The commission asks that the court order the group to register as a political committee, which under state law must disclose donors, or alternatively, that either the group or Apodaca be ordered to simply report the sources of the money spent on the political advertising.

New Mexico In Depth attempted through phone and email to reach Apodaca two weeks ago to ask why he had not disclosed the New Mexico Project’s donors. On Friday afternoon, it emailed and used social media to ask if he would disclose those donors now that the State Ethics Commission has sued him and the group. As of Friday afternoon, he had not responded to New Mexico In Depth.

Growing number of state officials failing to file personal finance disclosures Patrick Lohmann, Danielle Prokop, Source New Mexico

A significant and growing number of government officials in New Mexico are failing to submit paperwork disclosing their personal finances, despite a state law that opens them up to removal or lawsuits and a recent partnering of two state agencies that aimed to improve the law’s enforcement.

According to a Source New Mexico review, one or more members of 18 statewide boards and commissions did not submit annual financial disclosure information every year for the last four years. That inaction violated state requirements and prompted referrals for potential fines or lawsuits.

In total, 25 state agencies or boards had top staff or board members who consistently did not file in that four-year period.

Combined, the boards oversee billions in New Mexico taxpayer dollars, manage universities, oversee law enforcement training, and regulate hospitals, museums, gambling and near-space travel, among other important functions.

A spokesperson for the State Ethics Commission said she’s seen no evidence that non-compliant officials or board members are hiding something or deliberately trying not to disclose conflicts of interest.

The increasing lack of transparency occurs as the New Mexico budget has increased 30% over the last four years, a roughly $3 billion increase since 2019 that coincides with new state agencies and boards created to manage it. Increasingly, state lawmakers are investing budget surpluses into investments or endowments overseen by boards and commissions whose members fall under the Financial Disclosure Act.

Each spring since 2021, the New Mexico Secretary of State has submitted lists of hundreds of statewide government leaders and appointees to prominent boards who did not voluntarily comply with the Financial Disclosure Act. The number of individuals on that list has increased over time.

In 2021, the Secretary of State’s Office and the newly created State Ethics Commission joined forces by striking an agreement they hoped would lead to better enforcement of the Financial Disclosure Act.

A 2019 amendment to the law requires legislative candidates and some public officials to publicly file personal financial information about themselves and their spouses, along with real estate holdings and other potential conflicts of interest. Those who fail to file the forms could face disqualification as a candidate or removal from their position, according to the act.

The agreement requires the Secretary of State to send a notice to a board member or public official who did not file their form by a January deadline, and allow for 10 days for a response. If there’s no response, the Secretary of State’s Office sends the Ethics Commission a list of all non-compliant officials, which is then tasked with seeking compliance or even filing a lawsuit against anyone that continues to flout the law.

DISCLOSURE BY THE NUMBERS

Since 2021, the Secretary of State failed to get voluntary compliance from 533 officials, according to records the office provided to Source New Mexico. In that time, the office has submitted four lists each containing between 85 and 176 names.

The four lists contained at least 345 names that appeared 533 times. Of them, 16 officials have failed to file every year for the last four years, and 20 officials failed to file three of the last four years, according to a Source New Mexico review.

On the lists are high-ranking officials at state agencies and boards, plus leaders of lesser-known statewide entities like the Miners Colfax Medical Center, the Intertribal Ceremonial Office in Gallup and the Cumbres and Toltec Scenic Railroad Commission.

‘MAYBE PEOPLE AREN’T TAKING THIS SERIOUSLY’

Jane Kirkpatrick, spokesperson for the State Ethics Commission, said Friday the commission, created in 2019 with nine full-time employees, is too short-staffed to go after everyone on the lists. So it prioritizes its enforcement efforts on state agency leaders and board members who oversee “significant amounts of state funds.”

Kirkpatrick said the commission has successfully brought officials into compliance without the need for a lawsuit, though she said the commission has only gone after a small minority of the hundreds of names it’s received for the last four years.

She did not know offhand the exact number of officials it deemed “targets” for enforcement, but she provided an October 2023 commission news release touting its success obtaining disclosures from unnamed officials at the Office of the State Engineer, the State Board of Finance, the State Investment Council and elsewhere.

Still, the number of officials referred by the Secretary of State has increased since 2021, as has the number of boards and commissions with members in violation.

In mid-April of this year, the office sent over a list that contained 176 names, the highest such total since the new process began four years ago.

The commission estimated in October 2023 that 675 officials and candidates statewide are required to file the disclosure forms, meaning at least a quarter of officials statewide failed to disclose in 2024.

State law requires financial disclosures every January from state agency heads and members of boards whose appointments are contingent on state Senate approval.

Statewide legislative candidates are required to file their forms when they file to run for office, typically in March of an election year.

So far, none of the names on the lists provided by the Secretary of State has belonged to a candidate or elected lawmaker. It is unclear based on a review of the Secretary of State’s website if that’s because they all complied with the law or because they somehow evaded the attention of the Secretary of State in its compliance review.

Kirkpatrick said, in her view, none of the officials the Ethics Commission has pursued for violations seemed to be hiding something or deliberately sought to avoid disclosure.

Instead, those the commission has reached out incorrectly thought they’d filed the disclosure form as required, or they thought they weren’t obligated to file a disclosure.

The Secretary of State’s Campaign Finance Information System (CFIS), the online portal where candidates and officials file, can be wonky or hard for filers, she said.

“CFIS has some issues, where people think they’re filing, and it’s not going through,” she said. “We’re calling these people up to get in compliance, and they completely think that they’re compliant.”

Kirkpatrick also said the commission regularly encounters officials who don’t seem to take the Financial Disclosure Act seriously, treating more as a “paperwork process” than a meaningful effort to provide the public with relevant information about the people who run the government.

“Maybe people aren’t taking this seriously, because we haven’t made them take it seriously, or we haven’t done something more stringent,” she said.

The commission has endorsed two similar bills in the 2022 and 2023 legislative session that would beef up the requirements for filers, to include additional requirements like disclosure of assets, stock holdings, outstanding debt and gifts received. It would also create criminal penalties and hefty fines.

Both bills failed.

In January of 2023, the city of Albuquerque adopted its own version of the Financial Disclosure Act, drawing heavily from the failed legislation, according to the Albuquerque Journal.

In many ways, Albuquerque adopting those principles made it a “a model in the area of financial disclosure law,” Jeremy Farris, the executive director of the state Ethics Commission, told city councilors at the time.

The current state law, while somewhat easy to ignore, is also ambiguous in some respects.

For example, candidates for district attorney are not required to file disclosures, even though their incumbent opponents are required. Also, it’s not clear who enforces disclosure rules when it comes to some state boards and commissions, including the Water Quality Control Commission, when they have additional requirements to disclose under the law.

“A lot of people are realizing that some of our statutes are not as clear as we would like them to be,” Kirkpatrick said. “And they’re not as stringent as they could be.”

Department of Energy expands lung cancer screening for former lab workers - By Austin Fisher, Source New MexicoPeople who worked at the two major national laboratories in New Mexico will have more chances to get medical screening examinations for work-related diseases, federal officials announced.

Those who worked for the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory or Sandia National Laboratories and are at high risk of lung cancer can also now get low-dose CT scans, according to the news release.

The DOE Former Worker Medical Screening Program is being expanded to New Mexico national lab workers who were exposed to radiation, asbestos, beryllium, and other carcinogenic metals and toxins, the White House announced May 3.

The screening is also “offered to all former DOE workers who have served the Nation in its national security and other missions,” the program said.

The screenings are being performed by the Worker Health Protection Program at the Barry Commoner Center for Health and the Environment at Queens College, City University of New York, and the John Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.

The new and expanded screening will be celebrated at two events in June, where speakers will include a former LANL worker, the director of DOE’s Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, the head of the Los Alamos Medical Center, the head of the New Mexico Building And Construction Trades Council and representatives of New Mexico’s congressional delegation.

CELEBRATIONS SCHEDULED IN LOS ALAMOS AND ALBUQUERQUE

From 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, June 5 at IBEW Local 611, located at 4921 Alexander Blvd NE # A in Albuquerque.

From 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Thursday, June 6 on the back lawn at the Los Alamos Medical Center, located at 3917 West Road in Los Alamos. Enter from Trinity Drive, take left at the first stop sign and park in the back lot.

Two wildfires grow in Northern and Southern New MexicoSanta Fe New Mexican, Source New Mexico

A wildfire sparked by lightning in northern New Mexico grew to over 4,200 acres Sunday thanks to heavy winds.

The Santa Fe New Mexican reports the Indios Fire in the Chama River Canyon Wilderness began on May 19 and remains uncontained. The Santa Fe National Forest has issued an emergency area closure in some areas due to the Indios Fire. And another fire in southern New Mexico has grown to 6,800 acres.

The Blue 2 Fire is north of Ruidoso and is also uncontained. The Forest Service said in a statement there are over 500 personnel working the fire. Aircraft are dropping water and fire retardant and firefighters have been placing sprinklers and hoses around houses.

Source New Mexico’s Patrick Lohmann reports the fires are burning in remote areas, and firefighters said they intend to monitor the Indios Fire but allow it to burn up a predetermined area, to “play its natural role in this fire-dependent ecosystem,” according to NMFireInfo.com.

The next few days are slated to be warmer and drier although there could be a chance for rain in the area of the Indios Fire.

A new service directory aims to help autistic and neurodivergent people finds businesses that fit them Albuquerque Journal

An online database has launched a directory that aims to help people who are neurodivergent or autistic find local businesses that tailor to their needs.

The Albuquerque Journal reports, this program is part of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Project, or ASAP, that was created by Dr. Rebecca Evanko.

Evanko herself is autistic. She is the co-founder and executive director of Wilderwood, which promotes autistic led programs and research across the state.

She said, one business had concerns for the additional insurance needs to have autistic people on the premises. Evanko explained autistic people are not a liability, but the business still declined to join the directory.

Evanko welcomes any businesses to reach out to Wilderwood if they want to learn more about what they can do to create a friendly environment for people with autism.