89.9 FM Live From The University Of New Mexico
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Santa Fe resolution could decrease the amount of signatures for new initiatives and referendums

Herm
/
Pixabay

Santa Fe residents will vote next week on whether it should be easier to bring initiatives and referendums before voters. City officials are mixed about the idea. Some say it could increase democracy while others argue it could make it easier for special interest groups to get initiatives on the ballot.

Currently, if someone creates an initiative and they get signatures from registered voters equal to 33.3% of the number of voters who cast ballots in the last mayoral election, that initiative can go on the ballot.

A referendum works in a similar process except it would repeal or modify existing laws.

The proposal on this year’s ballot would lower that threshold to 15%.

Cities like Albuquerque and Las Cruces already have lower thresholds. But councilor Carol Romero-Wirth argued in a meeting in August that the new resolutions would undermine representative democracy.

“I believe that we are elected to really dig in and learn about the issues and listen to our constituents,” she said. “I think in this community, we will find it used to do things counter to our values.”

Councilor Michael Garcia, who proposed the changes, disagrees and said that he feels confident that the community can see who is behind any particular initiative.

“So for example, if there is a PAC that is pushing for some type of special interest that might not be in the best interest of the community, the public will be well aware of that and will ultimately have the opportunity to vote in favor or vote against a particular measure,” he said.

Councilor Jamie Cassutt said at the August meeting the lower threshold could lead to longer ballots, which she experienced in California.

“It took a good, I don't know 10 to 15 hours to like study my ballot in the state of California,” she said. “And I can tell you, most people were not doing that.”

Garcia admits that some voting measures can be confusing but he believes it’s the role of the government to provide that education.

“The democratic process means that it's the people's government,” he said. “And I'm confident that the people will always step up to make sure that their government is meeting their needs, and their representatives are representing their values and their needs.”

He says changes like this can happen with these proposed charter amendments.

Support for this coverage comes from the Thornburg Foundation and KUNM listeners. 

Jeanette DeDios is from the Jicarilla Apache and Diné Nations and grew up in Albuquerque, NM. She graduated from the University of New Mexico in 2022 where she earned a bachelor’s degree in Multimedia Journalism, English and Film. She’s a former Local News Fund Fellow. Jeanette can be contacted at jeanettededios@kunm.org or via Twitter @JeanetteDeDios.
Related Content
  • Santa Fe residents will vote next week on whether or not to adopt a mansion tax or an excise tax on buyers of homes over $1 million. The tax would add 3% on the amount a buyer pays over $1 million. So, if a home costs $1.1 million, the buyer would pay $3,000. That money would then go to the city's Affordable Housing Trust Fund.KUNM’s Megan Myscofski sat down with Santa Fe mayor Alan Webber and Office of Affordable Housing Director Alexandra Ladd who says this will make the money the city puts into affordable housing more consistent by diversifying it.
  • Two of the seven City of Albuquerque bonds on the ballot in the Nov. 7 election go towards issues top-of-mind for many residents, elected officials and city council candidates alike: public safety and housing. Albuquerque Fire Rescue — not police — would see the biggest chunk of the $25 million public safety bond, and affordable housing would get the single largest windfall from another $35 million pot of money up for voter approval.
  • Los Ranchos de Albuquerque is a small village with agricultural roots near the city's north valley. The semi-rural community is also an expensive place to live. The affordability of housing amid an aging demographic has become a key debate in the four-way contest for mayor.