New Mexico immigrant advocates, police to propose streamlined visa process for undocumented victims — Joshua Bowling, Source New Mexico
New Mexico immigrant advocates and law enforcement leaders on Wednesday told state lawmakers they plan to reintroduce a bill in the upcoming legislative session in January that would streamline the process for undocumented crime victims to obtain visas.
Under current federal guidelines, undocumented immigrants who survive certain violent crimes and then cooperate with a police department’s investigation or a district attorney’s prosecution are eligible for a U Visa, which provides lawful status for four years. Typically, an official within the police department or prosecutor’s office handling the crime has to certify the victim’s eligibility for the visa.
However, advocates and law enforcement leaders told state lawmakers on the interim Courts, Corrections and Justice Committee that New Mexico lacks uniform standards for how police and prosecutors should certify U Visa eligibility. In some cases, the victim’s attorneys don’t even know who the certifying official is within a police department.
That jeopardizes a victim’s ability to stay in the country, and can also jeopardize a police department’s ability to investigate the crime and refer charges to a prosecutor, Albuquerque Police Department Commander Paul Haugh said.
“Victims need to know that they can come forward,” he said, adding that their cooperation is “fundamental to us as an agency being able to prosecute crimes.”
Haugh spoke alongside New Mexico Immigrant Law Center Associate Managing Attorney Valeria Garcia Tavarez and Santa Fe Dreamers Project Legal Director Deshawnda Chaparro. The three said they plan to introduce a bill in next year’s legislative session that would require law enforcement agencies to make decisions on whether to certify an undocumented victim’s U Visa eligibility within a specific timeframe, which would be expedited if the victim was simultaneously undergoing deportation proceedings.
They said they’re also considering how to add penalties for law enforcement agencies that don’t comply with the proposed requirements.
“Rarely are we having to argue with law enforcement agencies on the actual merits,” Garcia Tavarez said. “What we are seeing more uniformly — and the major reason why we’re hoping to enact this piece of legislation — is the vast majority of time, there’s just no response.”
Garcia Tavarez added that this proposal would mark the fourth time a similar bill has come before the Legislature.
Sen. Antoinette Sedillo Lopez (D-Albuquerque), who has sponsored previous iterations of the proposal, said she’ll support it in the 2027 legislative session because she’s heard of too many undocumented victims receiving “uneven treatment between jurisdictions.”
Senate Majority Whip Cindy Nava (D-Bernalillo) similarly supported the bill, saying that her family has undergone the burdensome process of obtaining a U Visa.
She said that Santa Fe police helped her sister, a Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipient, certify her eligibility as she sought a U Visa after being attacked outside Santa Fe’s Target store. Enshrining stronger guidelines and timeline requirements in state law would help to streamline the process, she said.
“This is something nobody actually wants to do,” she said. “It is not an easy process in any way, shape or form.”
Garcia Tavarez, the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center attorney, told Source NM after the committee hearing that she and other advocates are still examining whether an undocumented victim could expose themselves to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents by cooperating with a local police department’s investigation. She said recent immigration arrests in New Mexico are partly why the bill will include an expedited U Visa certification timeline for victims who are in deportation proceedings.
“If one victim doesn’t feel safe, none of us do,” she said.
New Mexico lawmaker seeks to scrutinize insurers’ ‘catastrophe models’ used to deny home coverage —Patrick Lohmann, Source New Mexico
A New Mexico lawmaker on Wednesday previewed a bill she said will shed more light on how insurance companies use sophisticated “catastrophe” modeling to justify canceling an increasing number of policies in wildfire-prone areas of the state.
Rep. Anita Gonzales (D-Las Vegas) told lawmakers on the interim Courts, Corrections and Justice Committee that she intends to introduce a bill at the upcoming legislative session that aims to curb a recent trend of rising premiums and insurance non-renewals in the state.
The bill would require insurance companies to provide more information to homeowners about how they evaluate wildfire risk to homes and neighborhoods. It would also require companies to provide premium discounts to homeowners that have taken established risk reduction steps, and give them a means to appeal company determinations homeowners think are in error.
Faced with a growing number of expensive natural disasters, insurers are increasingly relying on complex and secret so-called “catastrophe” modeling that informs their decisions to raise premiums or not renew policies, Gonzales said Wednesday.
Christian Myers, chief actuary for the state Office of the Superintendent of Insurance, said Wednesday that the systems insurance companies use to determine risk remain something of a “black box.”
But he said “catastrophe” modeling generally incorporates simulations of thousands of wildfire or other disaster scenarios to determine average expected losses in particular ZIP codes and also contemplates how a “worst case scenario” — like a once-in-a-1,000-year wildfire — would play out in an area given its insurance rate, housing profile and other factors.
Gonzales said New Mexico homeowners deserve to understand how insurance companies make such a determination, especially if it costs them coverage.
“The question isn’t whether insurers should assess risk. They must,” Gonzales said. “The question is whether homeowners and regulators understand how that risk is being assessed; whether investments that reduce risk are being recognized; and whether homeowners have a meaningful path to improve that risk classification.”
The Office of the Superintendent of Insurance, the state’s insurance regulator, recently announced that insurers opted not to renew more than 6,600 policies in 2025, marking the highest-ever number of non-renewals in state history and a near-tripling of that number since 2021.
Meanwhile, theFair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan, which offers insurance to homeowners who can’t find coverage on the private market, has seen a steady increase in enrollees, from approximately 7,400 in December 2024 to more than 7,800 in August 2026, according to data from the OSI Gonzales presented Wednesday, alongside the office’s chief actuary.
While most FAIR Plan holders live in eastern New Mexico, where wind and hail often make homeowners insurance difficult to procure, data state officials presented Wednesday show the most significant FAIR Plan growth in recent years has been in wildfire-prone areas like Lincoln, Los Alamos, Santa Fe, Mora, and Otero counties.
Gonzales’ district includes San Miguel County, which the 2022 Hermits Peak-Calf Canyon Fire hit hard. The number of homeowners relying on the FAIR Plan has increased in that county nearly 18% in that 21-month period, Gonzales noted, from 286 policies to 337 policies.
The lawmaker noted the increasing reliance on the “insurer of last resort” in her county and elsewhere, along with increasing number of non-renewals in a state that already has among the nation’s highest uninsured rates, makes it all the more important that homeowners receive more information about their policies and what they can do to keep them.
Gonzales’ bill would require insurers to disclose information about the catastrophe models they use to state regulators; take into account property- and community-level mitigation in their premium prices; disclose to consumers how high-risk they deem their homes; and outline steps homeowners can take to improve their risk certification.
For homeowners, wildfire mitigation often involves establishing a buffer around homes cleared of brush or other fire fuels and using fire-resistant materials in their roofs or siding. But Gonzales said homeowners currently don’t have guarantees that implementing those changes will reduce their premiums or keep them covered.
If the Legislature fails to act during the session beginning Jan. 19 next year, Gonzales said, “Homeowners may continue spending thousands of dollars on mitigation without knowing whether those improvements affect their classification.”
Gonzales also said she is considering language in the bill that would require insurers to be more up-front about modeling in “other hazards that have been indicated in our state, again as recently as the last few weeks,” she said, referring to recent flooding in northern New Mexico.
Insurance Superintendent Alice Kane told lawmakers that her office supports Gonzales’ bill and would lobby for it at the upcoming session.
Gonzales introduced a similar bill in the 30-day session earlier this year, but it never received a hearing. Bills that are not budget-related need special designations from the governor to be heard during 30-day sessions, and House Bill 204 did not receive one.
